Now live on iOS - Download

Aqua Voice vs Typeless (2026)

Last updated: June 22, 2026

Aqua Voice and Typeless are both real-time dictation apps that clean up your speech and type into any app. Aqua Voice runs its own benchmarked model, Avalon. Typeless leans into platform and language breadth with a strong privacy pitch. Here's how they compare on accuracy, price, platforms, and privacy.

Aqua Voice and Typeless comparison preview

Aqua Voice and Typeless are both real-time dictation apps. Aqua Voice runs its own benchmarked model (97.3% on AISpeak, its own benchmark, plus an independent 9to5Mac test) at $8/month, with a developer API. Typeless covers more platforms (including Android) and 100+ languages with a bigger free tier and a strong privacy pitch, but hasn't disclosed its model or published accuracy.

Typeless and Aqua Voice do the same core thing: press a key, talk, and get clean, formatted text in any app, with filler words and self-corrections removed, a personal dictionary, and per-app tone. On the surface they're close.

They make different bets underneath. Typeless leans into breadth: more platforms (it lists Android and iPhone alongside Mac and Windows), 100+ languages, a large free tier, and a privacy-first pitch. Aqua Voice leans into a model it owns and benchmarks publicly, a lower price, and a developer API.

Aqua Voice publishes its accuracy and Typeless doesn't. Avalon ranked #1 among proprietary systems on the public OpenASR leaderboard at its October 2025 debut and scores 97.3% on AISpeak, our benchmark of AI and technical terms. Independent reviewers have checked it: 9to5Mac measured Aqua at 1 error to Apple Dictation's 17, and TechCrunch grouped Aqua among the fastest dictation apps.

Typeless hasn't disclosed which speech model it runs, and it publishes no accuracy or latency benchmarks. That means there's no public number to verify, where Aqua's results are out in the open for you to check.

You can see Avalon's results on the OpenASR leaderboard and read more in our Avalon write-up. Try Aqua Voice free.

Broader platform coverage. Typeless lists Mac, Windows, iPhone, and Android. Aqua Voice runs on Mac, Windows, and iPhone but not Android, so if you dictate on an Android phone, Typeless covers it and Aqua Voice doesn't.

More languages and a bigger free tier. Typeless advertises 100+ languages (Aqua Voice supports 49) and a large weekly free allowance (it lists 8,000 words per week, versus Aqua Voice's 1,000 lifetime words). If you want wide language coverage or a generous free plan, Typeless has the edge.

A privacy-first pitch. Typeless advertises zero cloud data retention and says it doesn't train on your data, which reviewers have praised. Aqua Voice is SOC 2 Type II certified with an org-wide Privacy Mode on Team plans, but Typeless's default privacy posture is a real draw for some users.

Accuracy you can verify

Avalon's results are public: #1 among proprietary systems on the OpenASR leaderboard at its October 2025 debut, 97.3% on AISpeak, and an independent 9to5Mac test. Typeless hasn't disclosed its speech model or published any accuracy numbers.

Its own model, plus a developer API

Aqua Voice runs Avalon, a model it trained and benchmarks publicly, and exposes it through the Avalon API, OpenAI-compatible, at $0.39/hour of audio. Typeless hasn't disclosed which speech model it uses, and lists no developer API.

Lower price

Aqua Voice Pro is $8/month billed annually ($96/year). Typeless Pro is $12/month billed annually, or $30/month billed monthly. For the paid plan, Aqua Voice costs less.

Independently noted speed

TechCrunch grouped Aqua Voice among the fastest dictation apps, and Avalon streams text as you speak. Typeless claims fast dictation but publishes no latency figures.

Built for technical and AI vocabulary

If you dictate code, prompts, terminal commands, or framework names, Avalon was trained for exactly that, reaching 97.3% on our AISpeak benchmark, and the desktop app reads the active window for context.

Aqua Voice

Typeless

Speech model

Avalon (own, benchmarked publicly)

Undisclosed (third-party cloud)

Public benchmark

#1 proprietary on OpenASR (Oct 2025 debut)

Not published

Technical-term accuracy

97.3% (AISpeak, our benchmark)

Not published

Independent test

✅ 9to5Mac (1 error vs Apple's 17)

Not published

Mac / Windows / iPhone

✅ (per Typeless)

Android

✅ (per Typeless)

Languages

49

100+

Free tier

1,000 lifetime words

8,000 words/week (per Typeless)

Privacy

SOC 2 Type II; Privacy Mode (Team)

Pitches zero cloud retention, no training on data

Developer API

Avalon API ($0.39/hr)

None listed

Pro price

$8/mo ($96/yr)

$12/mo annual, $30/mo monthly

Best for

Verifiable accuracy, price, developers

Platform/language breadth, big free tier

Pick Aqua Voice if: You want accuracy you can verify against public benchmarks and an independent test; you want a lower price ($8/month) and a developer API; or you dictate code and technical terms and want a model purpose-built for them.

Pick Typeless if: You need Android or the broadest platform coverage; you want 100+ languages or a large free tier; or a zero-retention, doesn't-train-on-your-data privacy pitch is your top priority.

Aqua Voice is free to start, so you can compare it on the words you actually dictate before paying.

Or just ask ChatGPT.

Is Aqua Voice a good Typeless alternative?

Yes, depending on what you weigh most. Aqua Voice runs its own model, Avalon, with published benchmarks and an independent 9to5Mac press test, costs less ($8/month), and offers a developer API. Typeless covers more platforms (including Android) and languages, with a larger free tier and a strong privacy pitch. If verifiable accuracy and price matter most, Aqua Voice is the stronger pick; if platform and language breadth matter most, Typeless is worth a look.

What's the difference between Aqua Voice and Typeless?

Both are real-time dictation apps that clean up speech and type into any app. Aqua Voice runs Avalon, its own model, with published benchmarks and an independent press test, on Mac, Windows, and iPhone, for $8/month. Typeless lists Mac, Windows, iPhone, and Android and 100+ languages, with a large free tier, but it hasn't disclosed which speech model it uses or published accuracy numbers.

Is Aqua Voice more accurate than Typeless?

Aqua Voice publishes its accuracy and Typeless doesn't. Avalon ranked #1 among proprietary systems on the public OpenASR leaderboard at its October 2025 debut and scores 97.3% on AISpeak, our benchmark of AI and technical terms, with an independent 9to5Mac test (1 error to Apple Dictation's 17). Typeless hasn't disclosed its speech model or published accuracy benchmarks, so there's no public number to compare against.

Is Aqua Voice cheaper than Typeless?

On the paid plan, yes. Aqua Voice Pro is $8/month billed annually ($96/year). Typeless Pro is $12/month billed annually, or $30/month billed monthly. Typeless has the more generous free tier, though: it lists 8,000 words per week, versus Aqua Voice's 1,000 lifetime words on the free Starter plan.

Does Aqua Voice work on Android?

No. Aqua Voice runs on Mac, Windows, and iPhone. Typeless lists Android (and iPhone) on its site, so if you need dictation on Android specifically, Typeless covers it and Aqua Voice doesn't.

How private is Aqua Voice compared to Typeless?

Aqua Voice is SOC 2 Type II certified (independently audited), with an org-wide Privacy Mode on Team plans; both process audio in the cloud. Typeless makes a strong privacy pitch, advertising zero cloud data retention and that it doesn't train on your data. If a maximal privacy posture on every plan is your priority, weigh Typeless's claims; if independent security certification matters, Aqua Voice is SOC 2 Type II.

How many languages does Aqua Voice support?

Aqua Voice supports 49 languages with automatic detection. Typeless advertises 100+ languages. If you need a language Aqua Voice doesn't cover, Typeless has broader coverage; for English and the 49 supported languages, Aqua Voice leads on accuracy you can verify.

Is Aqua Voice good for coding and AI prompting?

Yes, it's what Aqua Voice is built for. Avalon was trained on the speech developers and AI users produce, reaching 97.3% accuracy on technical terms like programming keywords, framework names, and CLI commands. It also reads the active app for context and offers the Avalon API for developers.